Benghazi exposé gets royal Clinton treatment


The progressive activist organization Media Matters for America, known for its close ties to the Clintons, has smeared an upcoming book about the Benghazi attacks that in part exposes Hillary Clinton’s personal role in the scandal.

Media Matters gave no indication it actually obtained or reviewed the book, set for release next Tuesday. Instead, its misinformed claims were based, according to Media Matters’ own report, solely on a four-sentence description regarding the contents of the book published in the Washington Examiner.

The book, by radio host, New York Times bestselling author and WND reporter Aaron Klein is “The REAL Benghazi Story: What the White House and Hillary Don’t Want You to Know.”

The work breaks new ground on events leading to the attack and cites information that contradicts the Obama administration’s version of what took place that ill-fated night.

A posting by Media Matters’ Matt Gertz attacked the book under the headline “Reported Central Contentions Of New Benghazi Book Already Debunked.”

The scandal may have been covered up, but the truth is about to come out in “The REAL Benghazi Story: What the White House and Hillary Don’t Want You to Know.” Order it now at the WND Superstore!

Without quoting from the book, Media Matters cites a report from the Washington Examiner’s Paul Bedard, who reported Klein argues Hillary Clinton “was unwilling to provide additional security to the diplomatic outpost and even played a role in sending Stevens to his ‘doomed mission.”

Gertz assumes Klein’s contention references what the Media Matters blogger calls “the long-debunked conservative claim that the then-Secretary of State personally signed off on cables rejecting requests for additional security.”

Gertz claimed that contention was debunked because “diplomatic reporters noted that every cable sent to the State Department from overseas facilities is addressed to the secretary … even though the secretary rarely reviews them.”

He further quotes from Clinton’s memoirs, “Hard Choices,” in which the former secretary wrote she never saw the cables requesting additional security.

“That’s not how it works. It shouldn’t. And it didn’t,” Clinton writes.

However, Gertz’s assumption is wrong. Klein’s book was not simply referring to cables requesting more security.

“The REAL Benghazi Story” documents Clinton personally signed waivers that allowed the facility to be legally occupied, since it did not meet the minimum official security standards set by the State Department.

While some of the required waivers technically could have been issued by lower-level State Department officials, several could only have been approved by Clinton herself, including what is known as the “co-location” requirement.

The “co-location” requirement refers to the unusual housing setup in Benghazi in which intelligence and State Department personnel were kept in two separate locations.

Asks Klein in his book: By signing the waivers, “did Clinton know she was approving a woefully unprotected compound?”

“If not then at the very least she is guilty of dereliction of duty and the diplomatic equivalent of criminal negligence.”

Further, Klein shows Clinton’s top deputies, including officials known to be close to her, were responsible for some major denials of security at the compound.

In one example, it was Undersecretary Patrick Kennedy who canceled the use in Tripoli of a DC-3 aircraft that could have aided in the evacuation of the Benghazi victims.

Kennedy also denied permission to build guard towers at the Benghazi mission and approved the withdrawal of a Security Support Team, or SST, a special U.S. force specifically maintained for counter-attacks on U.S. embassies or threats against diplomatic personnel.

Klein contends it defies logic that Clinton was not informed of the general nature of security at the Benghazi facility, especially since she was known to have taken a particular interest in the compound. She reportedly called for the compound to be converted into a permanent mission before a scheduled trip to Libya in December 2012 that eventually was canceled.

Read more at WND

One thought on “Benghazi exposé gets royal Clinton treatment

Leave a Reply